Anything Above 100 Nits Is HDR

“The more accurate presentation of specular highlights is one of the key distinctions of HDR.” ITU-R BT.2390-8 Yoeri Geutskens, in a dreadfully misguided article entitled We Need to Talk About HDR, published a few years ago over at FlatpanelsHD in response to Vincent Teoh's scathing critique of The Mandalorian, whose highlights peak at 200 nits,... Continue Reading →

These numbers may surprise you

Many decried SMPTE's revision calling for a 5-nit surround as being too stringent, while Charles Poynton maintained the new standard was too lax. "SMPTE ST 2080-3 calls for a surround luminance of 5 nt (that is, 5% of the 100 nit reference white luminance of ST 2080-1). ST 2080-3's Annex A provides a highly questionable... Continue Reading →

Kodak hired more psychologists than chemists

“For a long time, many people have thought, 'Well, film has this S-curve kind of thing, it must be some sort of limitation of the photochemical process'. It isn’t. It was designed into the photochemical process. Eastman Kodak for years actually hired more psychologists than chemists for a period of time. They would go around... Continue Reading →

Short Takes: Remote Review From A Bathtub

From an interview with Anastas Michos, ASC, GSC, about his work on “The Autopsy”, from Guillermo del Toro’s Cabinet of Curiosities Phedon Papamichael, ASC, GSC: I have a question. Just real quick about the DI, because you keep mentioning it. I was at the ASC clubhouse, and we were talking about agents and DI time and all... Continue Reading →

HDR: Disruption or Natural Progression?

“I think cinematographers have always advocated for a better experience for the audience, whether it’s fast film stocks with tighter grain, better projection technology, or higher quality digital-capture and display technologies. HDR is just another step in that direction.” Erik Messerschmidt At NAB 2023, Carolyn Giardina, tech editor of the Hollywood Reporter, sat down with... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑