BT.1886 Color Space Conflation

The Standard: ITU-R BT.1886 defines only a reference Electro-Optical Transfer Function (EOTF). No white point. No color primaries.

The Claim: Despite this, color scientist Charles Poynton states: “BT.1886 already has primaries, D65, and [an] EOTF,” making it a full “DISPLAY colorspace.”

Charles Poynton, PhD | LinkedIn comment

The definition: As defined by ISO 22028-1, a color space requires three components:

1. RGB Primaries

2. A White Point

3. A Transfer Function

The Verdict: BT.1886 provides only (#3). It contains zero specifications for (#1) primaries or (#2) a white point. These are exclusively defined by ITU-R BT.709.

Therefore, the claim that BT.1886 is a color space is false.

End of story.

Industry Perspective

The appendix in BT.1886 informatively repeats some info from BT.709 to clarify the transfer function in 709 is a reference OETF for capture and not a reference EOTF for display. The BT.1886 EOTF is also specified for BT.2020 capture and so does not specify a color space, only a reference EOTF. It can also be used with other primary chromaticities.Jack Holm, President & CTO, Tarkus Imaging  

Former Principal Color Scientist at Hewlett-Packard; co-inventor of image-specific color rendering (US Pat. 6,249,315); key contributor to ICC color management and AMPAS ACES. | LinkedIn comment

One thought on “BT.1886 Color Space Conflation

Add yours

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑